Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 08:06

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s going on with measles, bird flu, and COVID? Here’s a guide to the latest. - The Boston Globe
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Google Confirms Most Gmail Users Must Upgrade All Their Accounts - Forbes
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How Apple Created a Custom iPhone Camera for ‘F1’ - WIRED
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What led Megan to marry into the Royal Family despite her successful acting career in Hollywood?
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How safe is the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, really? - BBC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Pacific sediment cores unlock millions of years of climate history - Earth.com